Keeping secrets from your partner

It is not the thing that is heavy. It is holding it in place.

Therapy with Mark will help you see what the silence is being asked to carry.

In this article
Site icon

Choose TherapyMark as a preferred source on Google.

At a glance

Keeping secrets from your partner is not one thing. Some of what goes unsaid is privacy, some of it is shame, and some of it is a decision you have not made yet. Here is how to tell those 3 apart, and how to work out what the telling would actually be for.

Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy

I am Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.

  • The cost is in the administration. People report less guilt about the thing itself than fatigue from tracking everywhere it must not come up.
  • Protection points both ways. When somebody tells me they are protecting their partner, they are nearly always protecting a version of themselves as well.
  • Duration changes the meaning. How long something was held alters what the telling means to a partner more than the content of it does.

Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.

Why does something small weigh so much?

A secret is seldom heavy in itself. It gets heavy because you are the one holding it in position.

The thing itself does not move. A message you never mentioned. A sum you shifted. A feeling about somebody at work that took you by surprise. What moves is you: noticing whether the subject is drifting closer, steering gently around it, reading your partner for whether tonight would be a bad night. The content costs almost nothing. The holding costs attention you were spending elsewhere, and after a few months that shows up at home as flatness rather than as guilt. It is why people tell me they feel distant from a partner they have not stopped loving.

Is this privacy or is it concealment?

From outside they are indistinguishable. From inside they feel nothing alike.

3 questions help sort them, though no single one settles it.

  • Whose information is this? What a friend told you about their illness, in confidence, is not yours to pass on. Your own irritation with your partner’s mother is.
  • What would telling accomplish? Privacy asks nothing of your partner. Concealment usually spares you their reaction.
  • What changes if they find out another way? If the honest answer is very little, you were keeping something private. If the answer is that they would feel managed, you were concealing.

Use those as ways of thinking rather than a test to pass. A great deal sits in between, particularly early on, while the 2 of you are still establishing what belongs to the relationship and what belongs to the life each of you had before it started.

What am I actually protecting?

Most of what goes unsaid protects the relationship as you imagine it rather than the relationship you have.

Several motives can run at once, and they do not call for the same response. You may be sparing your partner hurt you believe would serve nothing. You may be sparing yourself from being known in a way you never agreed to. You may be preserving a picture of yourself you would rather they kept. Or you may simply not have decided anything, and the silence is holding a question open while you work out what you want.

That last one is common and it is not dishonesty, but it has a shelf life. A question held open for long enough quietly becomes a position, and your partner starts living inside a decision nobody has told them is being made. Go slowly here. If you tell yourself you are sparing them, and you also notice relief at not having to watch their face, both things are true and only 1 of them is about them.

What happens when I finally say it?

How a disclosure lands depends less on its content than on what meets it.

Across a week of twice-daily reports from 99 couples, what tracked with daily satisfaction for each partner was how responsive they found the other, more than how much either of them disclosed.1 The study was correlational and came from a single country, so it describes an association and not a cause. It sits close to what I see. A partner who hears something difficult and stays present changes the meaning of what was said. A partner who hears it and withdraws confirms the very fear that kept it unsaid.

That cuts both ways for you. You cannot govern how it is received, so the care you take in telling is not the only force at work. What you can choose is the timing, saying it once and whole rather than in instalments, and resisting the urge to manage their reaction for them, which tends to be felt as a second concealment stacked on the first.

How do I decide what to say, and when not to?

Start with what the telling is for, because that settles nearly everything downstream of it.

  • Name the function. Tell them because they need it to make sense of their own life, not because you want the relief of having said it.
  • Tell it whole, once. Information released in instalments reopens the same wound repeatedly and trains your partner to brace for the next piece.
  • Pick a time with room after it. Not on the way out of the door, not last thing at night, and never inside an argument, where it lands as a weapon rather than as information.
  • Say what you want to happen next. A disclosure with no request attached leaves your partner holding something heavy with no idea what to do with it.

Some things are not served by a careful conversation at the kitchen table. Where what went unsaid is an affair, or money that affects you both, or anything your partner would reasonably say changes the terms they agreed to, the conversation usually needs more structure than 2 people can give it alone, and a third person in the room changes what becomes sayable. And if what stops you is fear of how your partner will react to you, that is a different difficulty from the one described here, and it deserves attention of its own before you plan any disclosure at all.

I work with individuals and with couples, and this is frequently where we start: not whether to tell, but what the telling is being asked to carry. Sessions run by video wherever you are, and a free 30-minute call is a sensible way to begin. My work with couples is described on the online couples therapy page.

Questions people ask

Will therapy make me tell my partner something I want to keep?

No. What you disclose stays your decision throughout. My work is to help you see what the silence is doing, so that whatever you choose is chosen rather than drifted into.

Can I come alone to work out whether to tell them?

Yes, and it is a common reason people come on their own. Deciding what to say is work in its own right, and it is usually better done before a joint session than inside one.

Before or after I tell them?

Before, if you want the telling to have somewhere to land. Starting first means the conversation happens in a setting built to hold it, rather than in a kitchen late at night with nowhere for either of you to go.

My partner is keeping something from me. Can therapy open it?

Therapy can make something safer to say. It cannot extract it. What usually shifts first is the fear of your reaction, which is often what has been holding it shut.

How long does this kind of work take?

It depends on what the secret was holding, and I would not put a figure on it at the start. A decision about what to say can clear quickly, while work on trust that has already been affected is longer and less orderly.

Sources

  1. The Role of Relational Entitlement, Self-Disclosure and Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Predicting Couple Satisfaction: A Daily-Diary Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021.

How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.

In this article

Would you like support?

I am Mark Colclough, MA, a psychotherapist and EFT couples therapist working online in English with individuals and couples around the world. If this article touches something you are living with, a first 30-minute call is free and you are under no obligation.

Online masterclasses for couples

Three two-hour online sessions on one focus you choose together, starting with a free 30-minute Zoom call.

Site icon

Choose TherapyMark as a preferred source on Google.

Keep reading

Picture of Mark Colclough

Mark Colclough

Mark Colclough, MA, is a psychotherapist and couples therapist in practice since 2004. TherapyMark offers his online work in English.

Does something here feel familiar?

You can ask about support without first finding the perfect words. We can work out a starting point together.

Stay in touch with my writing

Sign up for my occasional writing on feelings, relationships and life between cultures. No spam, and you can unsubscribe whenever you like.

Request a call

Please fill in your details and I’ll contact you soon. I use your details to reply to your enquiry, talk through practicalities and, if you wish, arrange an online session. Requesting a call also adds your email address to my mailing list. Please do not write sensitive information in the message field.

Clicking the button adds your email address to my mailing list. Please read the Privacy Policy for more information.

P.S. I’ll call you in a bit!