At a glance
You may both want help and still dread a room where one of you might be found at fault. Couples therapy is not a hearing, and you need no shared account of what happened to begin. This article explains the first session, what comes after it, and what to do if only one of you is ready.
Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy
I’m Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.
- The dread starts before the first word. Many couples tell me the hardest part came in the days before the first session, when each of them pictured being blamed.
- Each partner arrives braced for the verdict. In first sessions I regularly meet two people who each expect to be the one on trial, and both soften when no ruling comes.
- The screen does not keep the pattern out. Over video, the exchange that repeats at home tends to show itself within the first hour, which is exactly what makes the work possible.
Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.
Is couples therapy where one of us gets blamed?
No. Couples therapy slows down the exchange you keep having, until each of you can see what you do to the other inside it. I am not there to weigh the evidence and hand down a ruling. Each of you will remember last Sunday differently, and I treat both memories as true accounts of two separate experiences rather than one true account and one mistake.
What interests me is less the subject you fight about than the step that repeats whatever the subject is. Perhaps one of you says everything is fine and the other is making too much of it. Your partner hears that sentence as a door closing for good, and the stomach drops before anyone has said anything new. Yet the partner insisting things are fine may be keeping very still because they fear the next words will be about ending it. At home, neither of you finds out which it is, because the question never gets asked. Couples leave this work in different places, some closer and some clearer that they want to part, and both outcomes start from the same first conversation. Read more about online divorce therapy.
What will the first session ask of us?
Mostly it asks you to talk while I listen, both to what you say and to what happens between you as you say it.
- Ground rules. Confidentiality, safety, and what becomes of anything one of you tells me privately.
- Why now. I do not need the whole story, only what made one of you reach out this month rather than last year.
- What each of you hopes for. I ask you one at a time, and the two hopes often sit further apart than you both assumed.
- The pattern, live. At some point you turn and speak to each other, and I watch what that does to each of you.
- What I noticed. I describe it in ordinary language, and you tell me whether it rings true.
- Your choice. You decide at the end whether to continue and what the next session should focus on.
The first meeting runs for two hours by video. A difficult conversation takes time to warm up, and a single hour tends to cut it off because time has run out, not because anything has become clearer. You can join from the same sofa or from different rooms, even different cities, provided each of you can speak without being overheard. Read more about online couples therapy.
What happens if we start fighting in front of you?
I let the argument go on long enough to show its shape, and I stop it once the shape is visible. Then I take you back a few lines and ask each of you what you heard, since the sentence one of you spoke and the sentence the other received are often not the same. I ask what you were hoping for in that moment: for your partner to agree, to apologise, or simply to accept that what hurts you is real. And I ask what frightened you. Arguing harder protects you from the reply you most fear, which is why insistence can look like certainty while underneath it feels more like panic.
Then I trace the circuit. One partner gets louder. The other falls silent, the silence lands as coldness, the volume climbs again, and before long neither of you is responding to what started it. Each of you is responding to how the other responded. In many couples I work with, one partner has spent years chasing and the other years retreating, and those roles rarely carry equal weight. Naming who does which is different from assigning blame. Nor does anyone have to give in to earn a hearing: you are each listened to before either of you concedes a thing.
What if only one of us is ready to come?
You can do worthwhile work on your own, though it becomes about your part of the pattern rather than the pattern as a whole. I help you look at what you repeat, what it costs you, and what it shields you from. It cannot turn into a way of steering your partner from outside the room, and if the sessions drift that way I will name it.
Your partner may never join. Then the real question shifts to how you want to live with that, which is harder than the question you arrived with and deserves the same care. Read more about online couples therapy alone.
Will it actually help us, and does the method matter?
Couples therapy as a whole has respectable evidence behind it, while the case for any single method being best is weak, and a practice built around one brand rarely says so. A review of 225 outcome studies of couple and family therapy, published between 2000 and 2009, found consistent signs that the work is effective1. The same review warned that reporting was often thin and that funding and journal habits favour positive results, so the picture may be brighter than the full truth.
Something shows up more steadily than any method: the quality of the working relationship between client and therapist. Across roughly 30,000 adult clients, a stronger alliance went with better outcomes in different countries and different therapies, whoever did the rating2. That research covers individual adult therapy rather than couples, and it shows an association, which is not proof that the relationship alone produces the change.
So it is worth asking a therapist which approach they use, and just as important to notice whether you both feel able to work with the person in front of you. The title therapist is protected in some places and not in others, so ask plainly where someone trained and over how many years. You can read about Mark and his training.
How do we take the first step, and when is it the wrong one?
Suggest one session about one concrete thing, and describe what you want rather than what your partner gets wrong.
- Lead with the wish. Saying you want the same Sunday argument to stop is heard very differently from a list of reasons they ought to agree.
- Keep it small. One video session, not a promise of months.
- Name your fear. If your reason for asking is that you want the relationship to last, say so before your partner reads it as a step towards leaving.
- Invite their terms. A reluctant partner often softens on hearing that nobody will be put on trial.
- Start alone if you have to. Changing your side of the pattern shifts the whole of it, and a partner sometimes follows once it is clear nobody is lying in wait.
- Bring the stuck conversation. If asking at home becomes its own fight, that fight is a good place for the first session to begin.
That a wish is heard more easily than a complaint is my clinical judgement, not a measured result.
These steps are the wrong ones if you are afraid of your partner, if one of you is collecting evidence rather than trying to be understood, or if drinking or drug use makes the conversation different from one week to the next. Those situations need attention in their own right first, and sitting down together too soon can make some of them worse. What usually remains uncertain at the start is whether you are both hoping for the same relationship, a question better explored with help than decided alone late at night. Booking a first session, or starting with the free 30-minute call, gives you somewhere to begin.
Questions people ask
Can we join from different places, or do we need to sit together?
Either works, provided each of you can talk freely without being overheard. Tell me which you plan when you book, so the first session does not open with the arrangements.
How long is a session, and how often would we meet?
The first meeting runs for two hours by video, and many couples then meet every two to three weeks. That pace is a suggestion, and you can adjust it to what you are working on.
Can we try one session before committing to more?
Yes, and it is a sensible way to begin. At the end you choose whether to continue, and I tell you plainly whether I think this work suits what you came with.
Will you decide which of us is in the right?
No, because a verdict would leave one of you defending it at home. I tell you what I notice going on between you, which gives you both something to work with.
What if one of us speaks English as a second language?
Mention it in the first session, because it changes who finds it easier to speak. I can then slow down and check that each of you has been understood.
If you want to know how a session with me actually feels, my page on online couples therapy walks you through the first meeting and what follows.
You may also find these helpful
Sources
- Silver, E., Stratton, P., Nascimento, N., McDonnell, L., Powell, G., & Nowotny, E. (2015). Couple and family therapy outcome research in the previous decade: what does the evidence tell us? Contemporary Family Therapy, 37(1), 1-12.
- Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy.
How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.